AP RESEARCH PAPER
KATHERINE KWON
1
Katherine Kwon
Clouded Cognition: The Effects of Nicotine
Vaping on Adolescent’s Lives
Word Count: 4,900 words
2
Introduction:
The reports on adolescents turning towards e-cigarettes have become clear in recent
years, as many teens are starting to turn to vapes to help them in various aspects of their lives.
With an abundant amount of advertisements promoting the use of e-cigarettes over cigarettes,
adolescents begin to develop a distorted view of e-cigarettes and believe that they are a
significantly healthier alternative (Tobore, et al). However, these incorrect viewpoints on
e-cigarettes become even more clear when observing how they affect individuals in different
areas of life.
Additionally, as advertisements constantly promote e-cigarettes over time, peer pressure
begins to play a significant role in the prominent use of these substances. As young adolescents
from across the globe become influenced by companies’ promotional tactics, many individuals
will go and spread the word to those around them, in attempts to come across as ‘carefree’ and
‘easygoing’ to others. One important factor to point out within these adolescents is that their
social groups will generally have more positive norms and opinions about e-cigarettes than
cigarettes because of the numerous commercials and advertisements vaping companies put out
that compare e-cigarette and cigarette products against one another (Piombo).
With more and more individuals negatively using word of mouth to promote e-cigarette
use, many of these adolescents will not truly realize the effects that e-cigarettes have until they
experience physical effects. Observing a select group of adolescents who began to vape at an
early age shed light on the direct correlation between mental health issues and nicotine use
(Livingston, et al). Subsequently, it was hypothesized that older adolescents who use vapes tend
to have significantly lower self-esteem compared to those who do not consume nicotine.
3
Although this was later deemed as false, happiness and vaping continued to reveal a direct link
with one another (Janjua, et al). Furthermore, chemicals used in nicotine-based products were
found to have caused several health issues, such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, and acute lung
injury.
Additionally, many parents show concern with their children who use e-cigarettes when
their academic performance begins to decline. Many adults have academic concerns about their
children, as it has a significant impact on their future, and many parents depend on their children
to take care of them later on in life. With this growing fear, many schools have implemented a
school security system to help these staff members and authorities detect potential nicotine use
within their building, in hopes of reducing this problem. This academic decline not only affects
the children’s parents but also the teachers, as it causes numerous disruptions in the classroom
and other peers’ performances to decline (Rock). This leads me into my research question, how
does the frequent use of e-cigarettes affect the attention span of adolescents and impact them in
various life settings?
Literature Review:
Cognitive Development:
To examine the rising rates and prevalence of vaping among adolescents, understanding
the relationship between cognitive development and vaping is crucial. Exploring the direct links
can allow people to understand the drastic changes that vaping has on cognitive development.
Therefore, these links will allow individuals to see the effects that an impaired cognition has on
4
their academic performance, overall well-being, and the way it alters the way one may present
themselves.
Karem H. Alzoubi reveals the behavioral changes that individuals experience that are
caused by nicotine use and sheds light on vaping’s adverse effects on memory functions,
learning, and academic performance. Alzoubi's study established a direct, harmful link with
e-cigarettes when she "found that ECIG use could potentially play a role in maladjustments of
young adults such as poor learning and academic performance, increased aggressive and
impulsive behavior, poor sleep quality, attention deficits, impaired memory, and cognition, and
increased depression and suicidal ideation” (Alzoubi, et al).
As it becomes evident that infusing nicotine into one’s body exposes multiple threats to
an individual’s cognitive development, it becomes crucial to create personalized techniques for
these adolescents to protect their cognitive well-being. Recognizing the detrimental effects
e-cigarettes have on cognitive development and function, government policies and intervention
must go beyond traditional methods, as it is currently insufficient in reducing the massive vaping
rates in recent years.
History:
The historical development and increase of the vaping issue reveals the many
contributing factors to this dramatic rise over recent years. This unfortunate rapid growth has
educated the general public about the concerning rise among adolescents with the use of
e-cigarettes and the beginning of nicotine addiction.
Vanessa Cezarita Cordeiro's research points out the escalating use of e-cigarettes as the
most used tobacco product among American youth. She highlights that “as the young brain is
5
still developing up until the age of 30, nicotine can also affect the formation of synapses,
tampering with the “wiring” of the brain and setting a teenager up for a lifetime of addictive
tendencies and potentially impacting mood, attention span and learning” (Cordeiro). In regards to
this dilemma, she urges to place bans on flavored e-cigarettes and increase the purchasing age of
these products.
Similarly with how vaping has become increasingly more prevalent over the years,
Carolyn Ann Stalgaitis’s research reveals the powerful influence social groups have on vaping
and identifies specific groups of adolescents needed to be targeted for future prevention
programs. Her study recognized that “rates almost doubled from 2017 (11.0% of 12th graders) to
2018 (20.9%), the largest substance use increase ever observed in the 44-year history of the
national Monitoring the Future study” (Stalgaitas, et al). To try and alleviate this alarming trend,
she and her team advocate for ways that healthcare providers can implement to reduce this
growing percentage of e-cigarette usage.
Gap Identification:
There has been a growing discussion on whether or not e-cigarettes negatively affect
other main aspects of life, in addition to solely just their attention span and brain development.
By understanding the direct correlation that e-cigarettes and vaping at a young age had on these
individuals, researchers could conduct qualitative research to deepen their understanding of other
aspects of life that vaping affects. This approach would not only create effective strategies and
methods to address this complex matter, but it would also shed light on the true harms vaping has
on one’s overall health and aid in developing personal strategies to assist these individuals.
6
Data Collection & Analysis Steps/Justifications:
For my original research, I chose to do a qualitative research approach with coding and
content analysis for my method of research. This method was most suitable for my study, as it
primarily analyzes previous studies and findings related to my research question. As my question
dives deep into the topic of frequent e-cigarette use affecting adolescents’ attention spans and
impacting them in various life settings, a qualitative approach seemed most appropriate for my
study to explore these behaviors and analyze the individual experiences.
The data collection process must begin with a clear, concise research question, in order to
move on further with my research. In my instance, my final research question crafted was “how
does the frequent use of e-cigarettes affect the attention span of adolescents and impact them in
various life settings?”. With my research question being centered on both attention span and
different life settings, it directly targets my chosen area of study. Additionally, ensuring that I
derived focused and clear objectives from my chosen research question helped narrow down the
scope, which helped me find data specific to my question.
To further obtain information relevant to my research question, it was essential for me to
gather secondary data sources, primarily from MackinVia and Google Scholar. Sources that came
from academic websites were used throughout my entire research process because it ensures that
my data came from reliable databases that have been peer-reviewed, which guarantees its
reliability. Subsequently, I would refine the chosen sources to ensure that I highlighted key terms
directly related to my research question, which affirmed that my sources were focused on the
information I wanted to obtain from my research question. Since I had specific areas I wanted to
study, such as attention span and numerous life settings, my key words consisted of
7
‘adolescents’, ‘attention deficits’, ‘behavioral effects’, ‘long-term’, ‘consequences’,
‘impairment’, and ‘interaction’. These terms were general enough to gather fixed pieces of
information, but precise enough to directly find answers to my chosen inquiry question. In other
words, my sources were chosen based on their level of credibility because I wanted my data
collection to be accurate and be a suitable analysis of my chosen research question and topic.
Subsequently, I created a document to organize the collected sources and file them by date to
properly show my data collection progress. Additionally, this document would contain
information on the research method chosen, life aspects it affected of an individual, any
quantitative data pieces for specifics, and the underlying reason as to why these adolescents
resorted to vaping. This allowed me to grasp a general, overall understanding of what each
source’s main points were, in order for quick analysis and to help me separate these sources into
themes for my coding process.
Furthermore, I made sure to have strict ethical considerations in place during the
selection of which data sources were going to be finalized in my final steps of research. These
ethical considerations consisted of identity concealment, which involved no exposure of age,
name, birthdate, and location. Ensuring that I was not only respecting the original data
contributors, but also having academic integrity during this process, I made sure that my chosen
sources met the ethical standards I had set and continuously maintained user confidentiality and
privacy.
Although I did focus on maintaining user confidentiality and privacy throughout this
process, as I mentioned before, my research utilized a content analysis methodology. In other
words, this type of study I chose primarily relied on preexisting data and findings from other
8
researchers using pre-existing literature reviews, rather than conducting my primary research
with human participants. My chosen methodological approach and data collection process not
only ensured gathering reliable information that directly addressed my research question, but it
also guaranteed the confidentiality of the human participants that might have been used in any
previous research I gathered during my literature review. Therefore, this analysis of preexisting
research from other researchers helped provide me insight into the impact of using e-cigarettes
on adolescents’ attention spans in various life settings and situations.
In order to effectively analyze the data collected using the steps listed above, a coding
method was used, as previously mentioned. With this process, each source was later reviewed
again to determine which specific life aspects I wanted to focus on during this research process,
which ultimately ended up being social, physical, mental, and academic. This was because the
data collection process enabled me to see that the most recurring themes analyzed in my chosen
sources were those four life aspects. After gathering these finalized major life aspects that
e-cigarettes affect, I focused on gathering different solutions to combat this prominent issue
growing and a chart was later created to organize these findings into the listed life aspects above.
This chart would allow me to get a quick, visual representation and understanding of the true
extent that vaping affects these individuals in several different aspects of life, which then led me
to try and find solutions catered specifically to these adolescents that I focused on during my
gap. In this chart separated into my main themes, I tallied the frequency of how many times a
social, physical, mental, and academic characteristic of my sources were mentioned. Although
this was my overall chart of all the four aspects, I made four additional separate charts organized
for the specific theme chosen. This better helped me understand and organize the direct effects of
9
e-cigarettes on a social, physical, mental, or academic part of one’s life in four distinct charts
while also having a broad, general understanding of all of these aspects into one chart.
During the final steps of finalizing my research and data pieces, triangulation was crucial
as it allowed me to further validate the information collected during the research process. Being
able to cross-reference the sources I gathered during the data collection process helped in
increasing the reliability of the chosen findings. Furthermore, triangulation helps remove any
potential biases that occurred during any previous researcher’s data collection that I observed in
my literature, which allowed me to confirm other researchers’ conclusions. This was because it
focused on gathering any key insights and points from several different sources, perspectives,
and methodologies during the entire research process.
Results & Findings:
The qualitative data analysis approach I had for my study involved a systematic process
that I had to conduct to review and synthesize the gathered data from my chosen sources.
Therefore, each source was examined to ensure that they aligned with my specific themes and
patterns in alignment with the impact of frequent e-cigarette use on adolescents’ lives. To
elaborate more on this concept, my analysis process involved the coding of the data and grouping
based on recurring themes, trends, and patterns that were identified within my coded data to
better understand the correlation between nicotine and young individuals. More specifically, the
separated themes I chose were social, physical, mental, and academic aspects of an individual’s
life that I decided to focus on. Subsequently, the coded data was synthesized to better answer my
chosen research question, as I now had a deeper understanding of my collected data findings.
10
Social:
Key:
Social: Number of times social influence is mentioned
Figure 1
Social
Jones IIIII (5)
Dubé IIII (4)
Total IIIII IIII (9)
In regards to the escalating rise in e-cigarette use over the years, Rebecca D. Jones
highlights the detrimental effects that early exposure to nicotine has during brain development
and the long-term cognitive consequences individuals may face. Jones pointed out patterns she
saw in adolescents that were being targeted, as "advertisements influence perceptions of
e-cigarettes leading users and nonusers alike to cite e-cigarette use as a healthier alternative to
smoking combustible cigarettes and reporting that they believe e-cigarettes contain fewer
chemicals, less nicotine, and less smoke than their combustible counterparts” (Jones).
Similarly, Catherine E. Dubé and her collaborators provide insight into how there has
been an increase in nicotine labels in vape devices, as "the introduction of a device called a “pod
mod” containing a form of nicotine estimated to be 2 to 10 times more concentrated than nicotine
found in other vape liquids” (Dubé, et al). Their study involved 90 students and highlighted
negative social influences and peer pressure that drastically encouraged the use of e-cigarettes
and nicotine-infused products.
Physical:
Key:
Physical: Number of times negative physical impact is mentioned
Figure 2
11
Physical
Lyzwinski IIIII III (8)
Livingston III (3)
Total IIIII IIIII I (11)
Lyzwinski and her partners highlighted the respiratory issues that come along with the
use of e-cigarettes, including asthma and bronchitis. Additionally, those who reported having
used nicotine or e-cigarette products were at a large disadvantage during the peak of COVID-19,
as “the odds of getting COVID were also five times greater in teenage vapers relative to their
non-vaping counterparts” (Lyzwinski, et al). Not only were they more likely to get this virus, but
Lyzwinski’s study also emphasized that they “found a rise in arterial blood pressure and heart
rate in young adult vapers using JUUL, but not in e-cigarettes without nicotine.
Cardiopulmonary risk is also compounded in dual e-cigarette and cigarette smokers” (Lyzwinski,
et al).
Adding onto Lyzwinski’s findings, Livingston and her colleagues found several oral
health difficulties that individuals faced after relying too much on nicotine and even finding
dependence on this drug. Although Livingston did state that e-cigarettes are a slightly healthier
alternative to traditional cigarettes, e-cigarettes still pose several problems to one’s overall health
and well-being. One of the more severe issues concerned with e-cigarettes is their uncertain
chemical concentration, as the “lack of consistency and regulation could place adolescents at
heightened risk of addiction or other harm resulting from exposure to toxins that may be present
in the vaping solution” (Livingston, et al). Inconsistent concentrations in e-cigarette products
being sold to the general public causes young individuals to be misinformed about the actual
nicotine concentration levels in a product.
12
Mental:
Key:
Mental: Number of times negative mental impact or health is mentioned
Figure 3
Mental
Pallo IIII (4)
Henderson IIII (4)
Wignall IIIII I (6)
Total IIIII IIIII IIII
(14)
Susanne Pallo's studies highlight how “both studies show that people who smoke and
vape – regardless of age – were most likely to report struggling with mental function. Behind
that group, people who only vape or only smoke reported mental fog at similar rates, which were
significantly higher than those reported by people who don’t smoke or vape” (Pallo). These
findings talk about how crucial it is to address threats posed by nicotine to individuals'
well-being, especially from a young age.
Furthermore, Emily Henderson expresses how “adolescence is a critical period for brain
development, especially for higher-order mental function, which means tweens and teens may be
more susceptible to nicotine-induced brain changes” (Henderson). This raises discussions about
when prevention programs should be implemented before it is too late to reverse nicotine has on
one’s cognitive development.
In addition to the cognitive drawbacks individuals undergo, Nicholas D. Wignall and
Harriet de Wit focused on discovering nicotine's influence on the attention spans between healthy
nonsmokers and unhealthy smokers. Furthermore, Barr used a modified signal detection task and
mentioned “that these enhancing effects of nicotine are complicated by possible preexisting
conditions affecting cognition, including nicotine withdrawal or disease-related impairments. It
13
is less clear whether nicotine also improves cognitive performance in healthy nonsmokers, and
whether it affects only certain specific cognitive functions” (Wignall, Wit).
Academic:
Key:
Academic: Number of times negative academic impact or learning is mentioned
Figure 4
Academic
Eyssen IIIII (5)
Danley III (3)
Total IIIII III (8)
In response to academic performance, Melanie Eyssen introduces the 'Sentry Plus for
Education' detection system to be implemented in schools to help identify the usage of vapes.
This proposed system "assists schools in implementing appropriate disciplinary actions. This
deterrence factor can contribute to a reduction in the prevalence of vaping and smoking within
the school community” (Eyssen). The urgency of the necessity of this system was stressed
heavily as it can work towards limiting the prevalence of vaping.
Discussing the effects vapes have on an individual’s mind, Dr. Joshua E. Danley's
contributions emphasize the concerning impact that vaping has on mood, attention, span, and
learning. He also provides insight into the misconceptions surrounding e-cigarette vs traditional
cigarette safety, in which he tries to convey that “the young brain is still developing up until the
age of 30, nicotine can also affect the formation of synapses, tampering with the “wiring” of the
brain and setting a teenager up for a lifetime of addictive tendencies and potentially impacting…
learning” (Danley).
14
Overall, frequent e-cigarette use among adolescents has an influential impact on
numerous developmental aspects of one’s life. Therefore, future implications for social
interactions, physical health, mental well-being, and academic success of an individual begin to
revolve in conversations in recent years. By addressing these varying aspects, individuals can
come up with different strategies to support these adolescents' well-being.
Key:
1: Jones 2: Dubé 3: Lyzwinski 4: Livingston 5: Pallo 6: Henderson 7: Wignall 8: Eyssen 9: Danley
Key:
A: Social B: Physical C: Mental D: Academic
Figure 5
A B C D
1 IIIII
2 IIII
3
4
IIIII III
III
5
IIII
6
IIII
7
IIIII I
8
IIIII
9
III
15
Discussion & Analysis & Evaluation:
This qualitative study has revealed several findings about the direct effects e-cigarettes
have on different aspects of adolescents' lives. Furthermore, these important findings have future
implications for interventions or policy creations to be made by officials, in addition to new
knowledge that was discovered about the horrific dangers of e-cigarettes.
Throughout the research process, I explored the many effects that e-cigarettes had on the
overall well-being of an individual, which also included the disheartening reality of how
tremendous peer pressure from others negatively harms adolescent e-cigarette usage.
Specifically, research conducted by Rebecca D. Jones and Catherine E. Dubé highlighted the
dangerous impact of marketing tactics and peer pressure that adolescents faced, which resulted in
these individuals turning to e-cigarette use. As e-cigarette use has become more normalized in
social groups, controlling adolescent e-cigarette use has become increasingly more challenging,
as there is a widespread misconception that e-cigarettes are a healthier alternative to regular
cigarettes. Therefore, there has been a sense of urgency in recent years to implement stricter
strategies to stop these rising e-cigarette rates and other societal factors that may affect
e-cigarette usage in adolescents.
Furthermore, the harmful effects of e-cigarette usage becoming increasingly more evident
on an adolescent’s physical health have pushed individuals to emphasize the immediate need for
stricter interventions to be implemented. According to Susanne Pallo and her research, she
revealed that nicotine exposure has a detrimental impact on academic performance, especially
when the adolescent's brain is still in its early stages of development. Therefore, there have been
several concerns, primarily from parents of these adolescents who vape, over the long-term
16
impacts nicotine use has on one’s academic achievements and overall well-being because of the
evident cognitive impairments e-cigarettes have on adolescents. Reducing the usage of nicotine
starting from a young age and encouraging healthier alternatives to e-cigarettes significantly
lessen the severity of these harmful effects affecting an adolescent and maximize one’s cognitive
development.
In addition to social and physical health, this research also emphasized the extreme
drawbacks e-cigarette usage had on an adolescent’s mental health. More specifically, research
done by Emily Henderson points out how vulnerable adolescents are to nicotine-induced brain
complications and changes, which cause mood swings and attention span deficiencies. This
direct link between e-cigarettes and the mental health struggles reveals the importance of health
officials and parents to offer a variety of support services and emphasize early intervention to
limit e-cigarettes being available before it is too late to undo the negative consequences.
Adding onto academic performance concerns, Melanie Eyssen's 'Sentry Plus for
Education detection system offered an effective method for detecting and approaching e-cigarette
use in schools. Additionally, findings from Dr. Joshua E. Danley pointed out how crucial it is to
place steps in place to decrease the amount of disruptions in a learning environment to help
maximize each student's academic achievements. Constantly advocating and encouraging a
nicotine-free school environment, providing a focused learning space for students, and offering
support to those who may struggle with nicotine addiction are vital to maintaining academic
success across schools.
Although analyzing qualitative data produces insightful findings, this methodology has
some notable downsides and limitations. Qualitative data is typically highly subjective, which
17
unfortunately makes it more susceptible and prone to researcher bias. Additionally, analyzing
only qualitative data pieces often comes with restrictions within the scope. Therefore, research
studies primarily consisting of qualitative data pieces tend to cause other relevant data sources to
be overlooked, as there is a large reliance on pre-existing research. To better understand the
research and triangulate the current data a researcher collected, future researchers should take
into consideration mixed-method strategies, rather than predominantly relying on qualitative
data.
Adding on to the previous points made, although analyzing qualitative data has produced
valuable data pieces with general understandings of how e-cigarette use impacts the lives of
adolescents, a mixed-method approach is better suited for this specific topic in any future
research that may be conducted. Although my qualitative research pieces talked about the basic
understandings individuals experience while showing the varying viewpoints of adolescents, it
was heavily limited in its ability to widely generalize its findings and apply them to broader
circumstances. Incorporating quantitative data, such as using experiments, surveys, or
conducting longitudinal studies, along with the pre-existing information found using qualitative
approaches, will allow these researchers to have a deeper, widespread understanding of the topic
of study.
Further, the central advantage that a mixed-method method approach has over the
qualitative method approach is its ability to triangulate the data findings. As previously
mentioned, triangulating not only increases the credibility of a researcher’s findings, but it also
increases its dependability. In other words, researchers can debunk any misconceptions made
about the data collected, as they can confirm their qualitative findings with the quantitative data
18
and ensure they align properly. In specific to my chosen research question and the research
conducted, incorporating quantitative data could have offered statistical evidence of e-cigarette
vapor rising in certain areas, demographics, or races. Whereas, qualitative data mainly helped
reveal patterns in past experiences adolescents may have gone through and why they decide to
resort to vaping as a solution.
All in all, a mixed-methods approach helps provide researchers with more flexibility
during their research, especially if any sudden changes come up with their study’s chosen
methodology. This flexibility is permitted because a mixed-methods approach allows researchers
to edit their strategy to appropriately fit their chosen research topic's goals throughout the
research process without having to change the entirety of their results. In certain circumstances,
researchers can prioritize pieces of data where the qualitative studies may be more prioritized
and gathered faster before quantitative data is considered in the research process, as it takes
longer to gather statistical values from individuals. This quick ability to adjust the study with few
difficulties helps make the research process be much smoother for researchers in case they
potentially changed their research method.
With that being said, future studies should focus on trying to address the limitations listed
above by incorporating different points of view from adolescents, teenagers, guardians,
educators, and even health officials. This will better help researchers understand the direct
underlying causes of why adolescent vaping has been so prominent in recent years, reduce the
nicotine addiction that may begin from a young age, and strive to provide support to those
struggling with addiction. Therefore, longitudinal research should be a crucial factor
incorporated when evaluating adolescent e-cigarette use in the future, as it can reveal the
19
long-term effects on one's health and well-being. Moreover, evaluating intervention strategies
implemented and measuring the level of success should be considered to constantly evaluate the
effectiveness of support services being provided to those in need.
However, there has been a growing discussion on whether or not e-cigarette usage among
adolescents is most directly impacted by social media and possible influencers promoting the
usage of vapes. Understanding the direct correlation the media may have on adolescents’
decisions on whether or not they choose to use e-cigarettes, researchers could conduct
mixed-methods research to deepen their understanding of the direct motivations. Gathering this
data from adolescents would further benefit researchers to help them develop specific
interventions with their target audience, which would overall lead to reduced vaping rates in
several demographics and populations. Not only would this approach create effective strategies
to address this complex matter, but it would also shed light on individual challenges when trying
to quit and help develop personalized strategies to assist them through any struggles.
Conclusion & Future Directions:
All in all, this qualitative research study that I conducted helped me explore and uncover
numerous findings, regarding the effects of e-cigarette use on adolescents’ attention spans and
their overall well-being. In other words, this study has helped shed light on the negative,
unfortunate correlation between e-cigarette use and its impacts on various life settings with a
thorough analysis and evaluation of adolescents’ health.
The implications of this research go beyond academic discourse, as it also targets public
health, education as a whole, policy-making, and additional guidance from adults. With certainty,
20
health officials and advisors will be able to better understand the true motives of the adolescents
who look at e-cigarettes as an immediate solution with the newfound information regarding
e-cigarette usage on one’s physical health. Therefore, individuals will be aware of new strategies
to approach this rising concern with adolescents and nicotine use, better understand how to
advise adolescents’ families about the dangers of e-cigarettes, and encourage more adults to
become informed about the implications to prevent this issue before it becomes uncontrollable.
For instance, teachers across the country are becoming equipped with tools to take action with
improved security systems in schools to limit this growing problem. However, going beyond an
academic setting, legislators are even starting to pass protective laws to limit the easy access
adolescents currently have to e-cigarettes. Therefore, the additional knowledge that these
individuals may have obtained after this qualitative study allows adults to become educated
about vaping’s harmful side effects, build greater trust with their children, and guide adolescents
to make better decisions in the future.
In regards to future research on this general topic, there are a variety of subtopics that
attract this particular study and research area. To begin, the direct connection between e-cigarette
use and attention span deficits must be discovered further, even beyond the current qualitative
research I discovered and conducted, as it continues to narrow down any biological,
psychological, and socio-environmental factors potentially involved with this correlation.
Additionally, to understand the long-term effects of e-cigarette use on one’s academic
performance, overall well-being, and mental function, longitudinal studies must be involved.
Furthermore, conducting qualitative research on initial opinions that adolescents have on
e-cigarettes or prior experiences that an individual may have had provides researchers with a
21
better understanding of how various life settings may affect individuals worldwide differently,
even though they are all struggling with e-cigarette usage, which can help researchers develop
personalized methods and tactics to combat this struggle.
This qualitative research study helped fill in any identified gaps prior to my study and
emphasized the detrimental effects of e-cigarettes on not only individuals’ attention spans, but
also how it affects adolescents’ day-to-day lives in various settings. My research will not only
help others better understand e-cigarette usage on one’s overall health, but it will emphasize the
need to protect these adolescents from further harming their well-being. Therefore, the future
implications of this research involves finding solid interventions to control e-cigarette use among
adolescents. To advocate for this, healthcare workers, educators, and policymakers must work
together as a team to find ways to address issues caused by e-cigarettes, particularly in
adolescents.
This research journey is a significant step to current knowledge of e-cigarette use and its
effect on adolescents. Continuing to move forward with this qualitative research study composed
above will further protect the health and future of these adolescents and increase the amount of
support for those struggling with nicotine addiction from a young age.
22
Works Cited & References
Alzoubi, Karem H., et al. “The Effect of Electronic Cigarette Exposure on Learning and Memory
Functions: Behavioral and Molecular Analysis.” Inhalation Toxicology, vol. 33, no. 6-8, 3
July 2021, pp. 234–243, https://doi.org/10.1080/08958378.2021.1954732. Accessed 16
Dec. 2022.
Cordeiro,VanessaCezarita.“UpinSmoke:TheUnitedStatesofAmerica’sVapingEpidemic
Threatens Adolescent Futures.” Humanium, 23 Aug. 2022,
www.humanium.org/en/up-in-smoke-the-united-states-of-americas-vaping-epidemic-thre
atens-adolescent-futures/
Danley, Joshua E. “Blog – Should We Really Be Concerned about Teen Vaping?” Main Line
Health, Main Line Health, 19 Nov. 2018, www.mainlinehealth.org/blog/teen-vaping
Dubé, Catherine E, et al. “Adolescents Who Vape Nicotine and Their Experiences Vaping: A
Qualitative Study.” Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment, vol. 17, 1 Jan. 2023,
https://doi.org/10.1177/11782218231183934
Eyssen, Melanie. “The Dangers of Vaping in Schools and How Our Detection System Can
Help.” Wynd Technologies, Inc., Wynd Technologies, Inc., 7 July 2023,
hellowynd.com/blogs/post/the-dangers-of-vaping-in-schools-and-how-our-detection-syste
m-can-help
Henderson, Reviewed by Emily. “New Studies Uncover Link between Vaping and Mental Fog.”
News, 28 Dec. 2020,
www.news-medical.net/news/20201228/New-studies-uncover-link-between-vaping-and-
mental-fog.aspx
23
Janjua, Nabeel A., et al. “Social, Educational, and Psychological Health Correlates of
E-Cigarette and Combustible Cigarette Use among Adolescents in the US from 2015 to
2021.” Addictive Behaviors, vol. 144, 1 Sep. 2023, p. 107754,
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306460323001491,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107754
Jones, Rebecca D, et al. “A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study on the Prevalence of e-Cigarette
Use among College Students.” Journal of Community Health, U.S. National Library of
Medicine, Feb. 2021, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317082/
Livingston, Jennifer A., et al. “Physical and Mental Health Outcomes Associated with
Adolescent E-Cigarette Use.” Journal of Pediatric Nursing, vol. 64, 1 May 2022, pp.
1–17, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0882596322000197
Lyzwinski,LynnetteNathalie,etal.“GlobalYouthVapingandRespiratoryHealth:
Epidemiology, Interventions, and Policies.” Npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, vol.
32, no. 1, 11 Apr. 2022, www.nature.com/articles/s41533-022-00277-9
Pallo, Susanne. “New Studies Suggest Vaping Could Cloud Your Thoughts.” URMC Newsroom,
URMC Newsroom, 13 June 2023,
www.urmc.rochester.edu/news/story/new-studies-suggest-vaping-could-cloud-your-thoug
hts#:~:text=Two%20new%20studies%20from%20the,vaping%2C%20non%2Dsmoking
%20peers
Piombo, Sarah Elizabeth, et al. “Impact of Social Networks and Norms on E-Cigarette Use
among Adolescents in Southern California: A Prospective Cohort Study.” BMJ Public
24
Health, vol. 1, no. 1, 1 Nov. 2023, bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/1/1/e000163,
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2023-000163
Rock,Amy.“Study:TeenVapingImpactsStudentAcademicPerformance,MentalHealth.”
Campus Safety Magazine, 21 Aug. 2023,
www.campussafetymagazine.com/safety/study-teen-vaping-impacts-student-academic-pe
rformance-mental-health/
Stalgaitis, Carolyn Ann, et al. “The Vaping Teenager: Understanding the Psychographics and
Interests of Adolescent Vape Users to Inform Health Communication Campaigns.”
Tobacco Use Insights, vol. 13, Jan. 2020, p. 1179173X2094569,
https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173x20945695
Tobore, Tobore Onojighofia, et al. “On the Potential Harmful Effects of E-Cigarettes (EC) on
The Developing Brain: The Relationship between Vaping-Induced Oxidative Stress and
Adolescent/Young Adults Social Maladjustment.” Journal of Adolescence, No longer
published by Elsevier, 28 Sept. 2019, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0
140197119301551
Wignall, Nicholas D, and Harriet de “Effects of Nicotine on Attention and Inhibitory
Control in Healthy Nonsmokers.” Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, U.S.
National Library of Medicine, June 2011,
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266322/